Nannette Croce is full of it

I subscribe to the weekly email from FundsForWriters, which features a variety of writing tips, markets to try, and pep talks from editor Hope Clark. This week, Hope published (with trepidation) a feature piece from a writer by the name of Nannette Croce who actually had the audacity to defend content mills like Suite101, Demand Studios and others that seek to exploit writers in most unpleasant ways.

Obviously, I think the woman’s argument is completely flawed. There is literally NO reason to write for these scam-artists, and I’ve written on this subject before, having investigated them for myself. But, in case you were wondering, here’s a copy of the email I sent to Hope, having read Nannette’s ridiculous article:

Hi Hope,

I’m glad you let Nannette make her case, as it shows just how flawed her argument really is. We should take a huge pay cut AND write stuff that can’t go on our resumes AND that will make us look bad as writers?! So… the benefit is WHAT? That these sites pay next to nothing, take all our rights, and continue to exploit writers at every turn? Sorry, but that’s not worth anything to me. Even when I find myself thinking I could use the extra money these sites allegedly supply, I tell myself that I could easily make that money (and more!) working a crappy minimum-wage job in retail, where (in Texas, anyway) people only make $7.50 an hour. [For the record, $7.50 an hour translates to $300 a week, before taxes, or $1,200 a month, which is far better than anything you’re going to get from Demand Studios.] Writing mills are a crock, and any sites that support them are equally worthless, in my opinion. Working for a place like Demand Studios gets you nothing but a lack of self-respect, and in turn, brings ALL of us writers down.

Nuts to that,
Laura Roberts

Seriously, if you’re thinking about writing for one of these places, you should just hang up your thinking cap and favorite writing pen and get a minimum-wage job at the nearest mall. There’s no shame in being a writer with a day job, but there is PLENTY of shame in selling out your fellow scribes and working for these slave labor camps that claim to pay writers fairly.

Suite101 and Demand Studios should NOT be listed as paying markets on any legitimate job sites. They do NOT pay their writers fairly, and you should NOT waste your time on them. If Nannette Croce wants to dig her own grave by writing for them (and, honestly, I believe Hope only gave her a bigger platform to preach to the uninformed masses, unfortunately, by allowing her to write positively about these scumbags), then let her. I think, in the end, that Hope’s quote from Ms. Croce concerning payment speaks volumes:

Thanks Hope. I’m taking the day off tomorrow since you just
paid me ten times what they pay me to edit one article for
Demand Studios and three times what I’d get paid to write one.

P.S. Lest you think Hope pays a king’s ransom for her articles, she gives her pay rates up front: $45 per piece, or $47 if you accept payment via Paypal. Hardly enough to live on, and yet Ms. Croce is defending 10 times LESS than this as a writing “wage” from these content mills. This must be the “new math” they’re teaching in schools, because something doesn’t add up here. As a published writer who knows there are plenty of markets that pay much better than this, I wouldn’t waste my time on sites like these, and neither should you!

2010: Time for a Short Story Challenge

I’m constantly debating with myself whether or not it’s worthwhile to enter writing contests, since I hate paying the entry fees when I have no idea how many potential contestants I’m actually up against. It seems a bit unfair not to know your odds. I mean, even people playing the lottery can at least envision their one-in-10-million chances and decide for themselves whether it’s worth the buck or two to just go for it. Should short story writers not receive the same courtesy when they’re gambling?

Anyway, mostly I guess it comes down to two things: the cost of the entry fee and the amount of potential prize money. While NYC Midnight’s Short Story Challenge 2010 is a bit costly to enter ($49 US), it does offer a potentially meaty prize of $1,250 for the first place winner, plus $500 for second, $250 for third and $100 for fourth. Not bad, right? You could at the very least double your money if you took fourth place, so that seems pretty good. It’s just too bad they don’t offer you some kind of a freebie for signing up, so at least you could get something positive out of the experience if you lose. Y’know, a nice “How to Write Short Stories” e-book or some such? All the cool kids are doing it, after all. Just look at the recent Funds For Writers annual contest, where contestants could choose between NO entry fee or a $5 fee with the potential to win some helpful Tweetebooks. Now that’s news you can use.

But back to the NYC Midnight contest: If you’re interested in signing up, the deadline to mail in your payment is coming up fast. Wednesday, January 13 is the last day to register, and there are plenty of rules you’ll have to read too, so get cracking!